Biotechnology

Tables

Google MapsGoogle Map

Table 1 -Top Biotechnology Employers in North Carolina, 2007

  Company Primary NAICS Codes1 No. of Locations NC Employment Total Sales
(US$ mil.)
1 Glaxosmithkline US 325412, 4242 3 5,165 NA
2 Baxter Healthcare 325412 1 2,500 1,500
3 Hospira Inc. 4242 1 2,000 1,500
4 DSM Catalytica Pharmaceuticals 325412 1 1,300 1,500
5 Talecris Biotherapeutics 325414 1 1,200 750
6 Wyeth Biotech 325414 1 1,200 750
7 Biogen Idec Inc. 325412 1 750 750
8 AAI Pharma Inc. 4242, 5417 2 700 855
9 Syngenta Crop Protection 325 1 602 NA
10 Bio Merieux Inc. 339 1 600 NA
11 FMC Lithium Div. 325998 1 475 300
12 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (Conva Tec.) 339 1 450 300
13 Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical 325412 1 365 300
14 Merck & Co. Inc. 4242 1 350 300
15 Charles River Clinical Svc. 325412 1 300 272
16 NC Mutual Drug Co. 4242 1 300 300
17 Tyco International US Inc.
(Mallinckrodt Chemical Inc.)
325412 1 280 300
18 Greer Laboratories Inc. 325414 1 206 15
19 Akzo Nobel Inc. (Diosynth) 325412 1 200 300
20 Qualicaps Inc. 4242 1 200 8
21 Actavis 325412 1 187 300
22 Leiner Health Products 325412 1 180 35
23 Eisai Inc. 325412 1 150 300
24 Embrex Inc. (Embrex Poultry Health) 325412 2 138 15
25 Ajinomoto USA 325411 1 130 300

1. North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)

Primary NAICS Codes: 325411 (Medical and Botanical Mfg.), 325412 (Pharmaceutical Preparation Mfg.), 325414 (Biological Product Mfg.)
Other NAICS Codes: 325 (Chemical Mfg.), 325998 (Miscellaneous Chemical Mfg.), 339 (Miscellaneous Mfg.), 4242 (Drugs and Druggists' Sundries Merchant Wholesalers), 5417 (Scientific Research and Development Services)

Source: Reference InfoUSA, 2/07

pdf top

Map - North Carolina's Top Biotechnology Employers, 2007


View Larger Map

Google EarthGoogle Earth map - (download free Google Earth)

top

Table 2a - Plants and Employment in North Carolina's Biotechnology Industry, 1996-2006

  NAICS   Number of Plants     Annual Average Employment  
  1996 2001 2006 change 96-01 change 01-06 1996 2001 2006 change 96-01 change 01-06
 
TOTAL   816 1,135 1,299 39% 14% 33,315 39,356 48,080 18% 22%
 
Medicinal and Botanical Mfg 325411   7 8 7 14% -13% 321 350 271 9% -23%
Pharmaceutical Preparation Mfg 325412   38 62 47 63% -24% 14,251 15,421 13,623 8% -12%
Other Biological Product Mfg 325414   12 14 16 17% 14% 1,854 3,132 5,186 69% 66%
Drugs and Druggists' Sundries Merchant Wholesalers 4242   196  232 224  18%  -3%    2,984  4,911 6,122  65%  25% 
Testing Laboratories 54138   170  209  217  23%  4%    2,765  3,308 3,207  20%  -3% 
Research, Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences 54171 271  441 586  63%  33%    6,992  9,219  15,543  32%  69% 
Medical Laboratories 621511   122 169 202 39% 20% 4,148 3,015 4,128 -27% 37%
NAICS = North American Industry Classification System.
Source: Employment Security Commission of North Carolina

pdf top

Table 2b. Average Annual Wages in North Carolina's Biotechnology Industry, 1996-2006

  NAICS   Average Annual Wage per Employee % change % change
  1996 2001 2006 1996-2001 2001-2006
 
TOTAL     43,630 60,975 74,252 40% 22%
 
Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing 325411   43,630 52,050 75,801 19% 46%
Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing 325412   48,910 69,316 83,937 42% 21%
Other Biological Product Manufacturing 325414   45,178 64,037 77,488 42% 21%
Other Biological Product Manufacturing 4242   44,370 60,725 72,284 37% 19%
Other Biological Product Manufacturing 54138   33,097 45,388 49,258 37% 9%
Other Biological Product Manufacturing 54171   43,728 58,172 78,326 33% 35%
Other Biological Product Manufacturing 621511   31,118 42,247 45,118 36% 7%

NAICS = North American Industry ClassificationSystem.
Source: Employment Security Commission of North Carolina www.ncesc.com

Note: The average annual wage found in the annual data is computed by dividing total wage payments by the average insured employment. These figures are not true average wage scales because (1) the wages, but not employment, of all the different persons on the payroll are reflected, and (2) the assumption is made that workers worked the full quarter or year although a number of workers are not employed the whole year or quarter, and certain plants may stand idle a portion of the quarter or year. These average wages should be considered merely as indicators of wage trends rather than actual wage rates.

pdf top

Table 3a - Establishments in North Carolina, 1990-2006

graphic

pdf top

Table 3b - Employment in North Carolina, 1990-2006

graphic

pdf top

SECTION LAST UPDATED: July 20, 2007