Fall 2001 

Soc. 144 Organizations and Their Environments

Office: 276 Soc/Psy Bldg
Office Hour: by appointment
Phone: 660-5620
E-Mail: bagao@soc.duke.edu

Prof. Bai Gao

MWF10:30-11.20am.
Social Science Bldg 111

 

Goals:

            This class is an introductory course about how organizations in the modern world--large or small, business or nonprofit, government agencies or churches--operate within environments, which simultaneously stimulate and constrain their structure and actions.

            The goals of this course are the following:

1. Discuss the basic concepts and perspectives on organizations.

2. Introduce the social science theories on the relationship between organizations and environments.

3. Employ these theories to the analysis of organizational behavior in the real world.

4. Help students apply these theories in their own research

            Three different components are designed in this class to achieve the above goals.  The first is social science theories on organizations and environments.  Except several sessions at the beginning of the semester, we will spend each Monday on these theories.  The second is how to make sense of these social science theories by applying them to the ongoing reality.  We will spend each Wednesday on the impact of internet revolution on organizations.  The third is team research projects through which students apply the theories we covered in this class to study the real world.  This component includes two parts: team debates in which each team would have an opportunity to take a position on a specific issue to debate with another team, and a final team presentation in the class and a research paper.  The team debates function as a self-learning process in which each team is expected to prepare a handout for the entire class and the contents of these handouts will be included in the mid term and the final.

            Each student is expected to participate in all team debates and final presentations even your team does not present.  Missing one evaluation sheet in these events leads to the loss of one point in the final grade unless an official letter from the dean excuses your absence.

Requirements:

            Three major components determine your final grade in the course: a mid-term exam (30%), a final exam (30%), and team projects (40%).  Both the mid-term and the final exams will be multiple- choice questions. During the semester, team will be the basic unit to organize debate and research project.   I will divide the class into 10 teams after the enrollment is finalized.  For each class I expect you to read the materials in advance and be prepared to discuss and ask questions. 

     
  The Distribution of the Grade      
  Item % in the total   Who decides the grade
  The mid-term 30%   instructor
  The final 30%   instructor
  The team projects 40%    
      A breakdown of the 40 %
for the team project
 
       a.   Each team participates once in a debate on the impact of technological revolution on organizations or our society
        10% other teams
      b. final presentation 15% other teams
      c. the paper 15% instructor
  The total 100%      

         

            All readings will be on reserve at Perkins library.  You may print out a copy of these reserved materials by using the web site "www.lib.duke.edu/access/reserves".  Once you get in this web site, please type "gao;soc144" at the search pump.  Then you will see a list of these readings.

Schedule and Reading:
8/27 M   Business Meeting  
8/29   Introduction  
    What is Organization?  
    R. Scott, 1992. "Chapter One: The Subject is Organizations," in his Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. pp.3-26.   
8/31 F   Group Discussion: The Impact of the Internet Revolution on College Students.  
    Background Reading:  Rachel Lehmann-Haupt. “The Dorm Room Economy.”  Business 2.0.  November 2000. pp. 204-212.  
9/3 M

Organizations and Environments: Three Approaches

R. Scott, 1992. "Chapter Four: Organizations as Open Systems," in his Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. pp.76-96.

 
9/5 W C. Perrow. 1986. "Chapter 6: The Environment," in his Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. Third Edition.  New York:McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Charles Grantham.  2000. “Organizations of the Future.”  In The Future of Work.  Pp.117-141.
 
9/7 F Video:  Internet Money Machine  
9/10 M

Social Structure of the Market

M. Granovetter, 1985. "Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness," American Journal of Sociology 91:481-510.

 
9/12 W

Social Network in the Era of Internet

Jeremy Rifkin.  2000.  The Age of Access.  Chapts 1-2.

 
9/14 F We will divide the whole class into small teams.  Each team will choose an organizer and has its first meeting to talk about the potential topic for the team projects. We will also decide the order of presentation for team debates and final presentation.    
9/17 M

Resource Dependence Theory

J. Pfeffer and G. Salancik, 1978. "Chapter Three: Social Control of Organizations," in their The External Control of Organization: A Resource Dependence Theory.  New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, pp.39-61.

 
9/19 W

How did the Internet Change the Power Centers?

Eric Hellweg, eds.  2000.  “New Power Centers.”  Business 2.0.  January. Pp. 136-162.

 
9/21 F I will talk about various requirements about the team debate and how to conduct a research project  
9/24 M

Technological Development

Alfred Chandler,  1992. "The Emergence of Managerial Capitalism,"  in M. Granovetter and R. Swedberg, edited, The Sociology of Economic Life.  Westview Press. pp.131-58.

 
9/26 W

The Internet Boom and Burst

Michael Mandel, 2000. The Coming Internet Depression.  Chapts 2, 4.

 
9/28 F Team Debate One: Is the Era of Internet Revolution Over?  Background:  We have seen the collapse of the technology stocks in the market.  The burst of the internet bubble has resulted into huge loss of internet companies’ stock values and many of these have fell into bankruptcy.  We are confronting a major question: whether the era of internet revolution is over.   
10/1 M

Neo-Institutional Theory

P. DiMaggio and W. Powell,  1983.  "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,"  American Sociological Review,  48(April), 147-60.

 
10/3 W OECD.  1999.  “Electronic Commerce, Jobs and Skills.”  In The Economic and Social Impact of Electronic Commerce.  Pp.105-141.  
10/5 F

Team Debate Two: 

Will B2C (meaning business to consumer) Internet Companies Replace the Traditional Companies? Background: the traditional distribution networks in wholesale and retailing industries are now facing great challenge from the new middleman who does business through the internet.  However, there is a great debate on whether the B2C internet companies could replace completely the traditional companies, or will Amazon.com replace Wal-Mart.

 
10/8 M

Transaction Cost Theory

Excerpts from O. Williamson, 1985.  The Economic Institution of Capitalism.  New York: The Free Press. pp.15-23; 43-51; 72-80; 103-129.

 
10/10 W Mid-Term Exam  
10/17 W

Organizational Ecology

G. Carroll and M. Hannan,  "Focus on Industry: The Organization Lens", and "An Introduction to Organization Ecology,"  in C & H, pp.3-32.

 
10/19 F Video:  Amazon.com and the World of E-Commerce.   
10/22 M

Political Influence

J. Campbell and L. Lindberg, 1990. "Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity by the State,"  American Sociological Review 55:634-47.

 
10/24 W Mike Hofman.  2000.  “Urban Outfitters:  Big-city Mayors Are Eager to Make Revivified Inner Cities a Part of Their Legacies.”   Inc.  May.  Pp. 106-115.   
10/26 F

Team Debate Three: 

AOL-Time Warner Versus Microsoft: Who Will Prevail in the Future? Background: In the past three years, both AOL and Microsoft have built up enormous strength in the marketplace.  Through a merger with Time-Warner, AOL obtained not only the biggest subscriber pool of 27 millions but also a very strong supply of content.  In contrast, Microsoft continued to occupy the operation system market with several strategic plans to expand its power over other areas. 

 
10/29 M

Cultural Environment

P. DiMaggio, 1994.  "Culture and Economy," in N. Smelser and R. Swedberg, The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp.27-57.

 
10/31 W Don Tapscott.  Growing Up Digital.  Chapts. 2, 10.  
11/2 F

Team Debate Four:

How the Information Revolution will Change the Career Pattern in the Future?  Background: this has direct implications to each of us.  In the past two years, we have seen a phenomenon that many people in various professions quit their former positions in the established industries, heading toward the internet startup.  In this year’s shakeup of the internet companies, however, we can also see a reverse pattern.  At the center of this debate is the issue of whether the information revolution would drastically change our future career pattern.

 
11/5

International Competition

M. Porter, 1990. "The Competitive Advantage of Nations," Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp.73-93.

 
11/7 W Mohanbir Sawhney, Sumant Mandal, and Jeffery Davis.  2000. “Go Global.”  Business 2.0.  May. Pp. 178-215.   
11/9 F

Team Debate Five:

Is Telecommuting the Future Pattern of Work?  Background:  With the emergence of the internet and other telecommunication technologies, the number of people who work at home increased rapidly.  Some analysts even predict that in the near future telecommute would become the major pattern of work in the US.  Critics, however, disagree by citing various reasons.

 
11/12 M

Organization in the Era of Globalization

R. Boyer, 1996. "The Convergence Hypothesis Revisited: Globalization but Still the Century of Nations?" in S. Berger and R. Dore, edited, National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University.

 
11/14 W Reading:  Peter Henig.  2000.  “The Global IPO Machine.”  Red Herring.  May. Pp. 186-202.  
11/16 Video:  To be Arranged.  
11/19 M Review for Final Exam  
11/21 W Preparation for the final presentation  
11/26-12/5 Final Presentations: Each Session with Two Teams.  

 Grading Sheet:  You will receive grades in number for the mid-term exam, the debate in classroom,  the team project final presentation, the team project paper, and the final exam.  Then the accumulated number will be converted into a letter grade according to the following criterion.  I will report this letter grade to the university as your final grade in this course. 

A+=100-97
A =96-93
A-=92-90
B+=89-87
B =86-83
B-=82-80
C+=79-77
C =76-73
C-=72-70
D+=69-67
D =66-63
D-=62-60