| Sociology 49S.01 |
Crime and Society
|
| Spring 2001 |
Dr. Williams
|
|
DATE |
TOPIC |
READINGS |
||||||
|
Jan. |
11 |
Introduction |
||||||
|
16 |
18 |
Crime Problems, Crime Policy |
WA Foreword, Preface, 1-4 |
|||||
|
23 |
25 |
Dealing With Crime – The Conservative View |
WA 5-8 |
|||||
|
30 |
Dealing With Crime – The Liberal View |
WA 11-12 |
||||||
|
Feb. |
1* |
Dealing With Crime – The Drug Problem |
WA 13-14 |
|||||
|
6 |
8 |
Thinking About Crime – An Alternative View |
RE Preface, Introduction, 1-2 |
|||||
|
13 |
Thinking About Crime – An Alternative View |
RE 3-4, Conclusion |
||||||
|
15 |
EXAMINATION I |
|||||||
|
20 |
22 |
Criminals on Crime |
CR 1-3, 5, 13-14 |
|||||
|
27 |
Criminals on Crime |
CR 15-17, 8-9 |
||||||
|
Mar. |
1* |
Growing Up in the ‘Hood |
CA 1-25 |
|||||
|
6 |
8 |
When Work Disappears |
WI 1-4 |
|||||
|
SPRING RECESS |
||||||||
|
20 |
22 |
The Social Policy Challenge |
WI 5-8 |
|||||
|
27 |
The “Cool Pose” Adaptation |
MA 1-9 |
||||||
|
29* |
EXAMINATION II |
|||||||
|
Apr. |
3 |
5 |
Crime and Neighborhood Decay |
SK 1-4 |
||||
|
10# |
12# |
Dealing with Neighborhood Decay |
SK 5-7 |
|||||
|
17# |
19 |
Crime Profiles |
MM 1-4 |
|||||
|
24 |
More Crime Profiles |
MM 5, 8-9 |
||||||
Texts: r CA = Canada. fist stick knife gun. 1995. r CR = Cromwell. In Their Own Words. 1999.
r MB = Majors and Billson. Cool Pose. 1992. r MM = Miethe and McCorkle. Crime Profiles. 1998.
r RE = Reiman. The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison. 2001. r SK = Skogan. Disorder and Decline. 1990. r WA = Walker. Sense and Nonsense about Crime and Drugs. 2001. r WI = Wilson. When Work Disappears. 1996. & On Reserve, West: Inciardi. Criminal Justice. 1999.
Office: 259 Soc-Psych Bldg. Office hours: TTh 2:00-3:30pm and by appointment.
E-mail: jwms@soc.duke.edu Office phone and voice mail: 660-5650
Grade weights: Class participation – 13%; Papers (3) – 36%; Take-home exams (2) – 26%; Presentation – 4%;
Final paper – 21%
Paper due dates are marked by an (*). Class presentation dates are marked by a (#).
Class participation: This class is a seminar. I will do some lecturing but
most of each class session will be devoted to a
discussion of the assigned reading material. Everyone is expected to contribute
to these discussions and 13% of your final grade
will be based on your contributions during class.
Do not consider these discussions a competitive event but rather a cooperative
learning effort. A good question is as valuable as a
good answer or an insightful comment. Your group effort to deal with the issues
we are examining in the seminar typically will
provide a higher yield for understanding than will an individual effort. Be
supportive of one another, be tolerant of diverse
viewpoints, and use constructive criticism. Above all, be intellectually curious.
Papers: Three 4-5 page papers will be submitted during the course. Due dates
for these papers are marked by an asterisk (*) on
your syllabus. The topic for each paper will be announced two weeks prior to
the due date. The 4-5 page limitation refers to the
text of the paper – endnotes and references are additional.
Take-home exams: There will be two take-home examinations. The first will be
distributed at the end of class on February 15.
The exam is due at the next class on February 20. The second examination will
be given to you on March 29. It is due at the next
class on April 3. You may use your class notes, readings, and other resources
for the exam, but your answers on the exam are to
be entirely your own.
Class presentation: In preparation for your final paper in the course, you
will make a presentation of ten minutes to the class
describing your final paper in detail. The class will ask questions and make
comments for the purpose of helping you improve your
final paper. Five class members will present per class. Three class periods
are reserved for this activity. These class dates are
indicated on your syllabus by a pound sign (#). You may volunteer for a date
to present and if you don’t volunteer, a date will be
assigned.
Final paper: You will write a 10-12 page final paper which addresses crime
in general, a specific crime problem, and/or the
criminal justice system’s (police, courts, corrections, and/or juvenile justice)
role in crime. You will discuss the nature of the crime,
the probable causes of the crime [if known], and past attempts to control the
crime. If you choose the criminal justice system, for
example, you will discuss how it may contribute to crime, fail to combat crime,
or more effectively control crime. You will then
describe what you believe to be, based on the relevant literature, a fresh and
appropriate proposal for addressing your chosen
crime/criminal justice system issue. You will also discuss the policy implications
for the implementation of your proposal.
In the January 1998 issue of Crime and Delinquency, then New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman said:
We can reduce crime. We can punish smarter. We can
rehabilitate better and more efficiently. We can bring
balance to criminal justice.
Assume that you are the Director of the New Jersey Crime Commission and Governor
Whitman has asked you to advise her on a
strategy to make her words ring true. Your final paper will be that product.